Subscribe

The best in health, wellness, and positive training from America’s leading dog experts

Home Blog Page 359

How To Choose The Best Shelter Dog for Your Family

Ask trainer Sue Sternberg where you should get a dog and, without hesitation, she’ll tell you to go to an animal shelter. She should know – as a nationally recognized dog trainer and owner of Rondout Valley Kennels, a boarding kennel, training and behavior center, and private shelter in Accord, New York, she regularly works with shelters across the country, and counsels families who have adopted from them.

In addition, Sternberg has produced several booklets and videotapes about issues specific to shelter dogs and shelter dog adoption. The booklets include Temperament Testing for Dogs in Shelters and A Guide to Choosing your Next Dog from the Shelter; the videos include The Controversial Pit Bull about temperament testing Pit Bulls in shelters, and Training Your Shelter Dog. She also is a frequent and popular speaker at all sorts of dog-related venues.

Setting aside all of the arguments for buying a puppy from a breeder, Sternberg emphatically pronounces that you should adopt a dog from a shelter because, as she says, “it’s the right thing to do. Because there are great dogs in animal shelters, and because dogs in shelters need homes. There is no need to get a puppy from a breeder in order to raise it right – getting your dog at an early age is no guarantee of how he will turn out. Plus, you can find all the great qualities you could ever want in a shelter mixed-breed dog or puppy, or in one of the thousands of purebreds waiting in shelters on any given day.”

Of course, there are plenty of canine train wrecks desperately seeking homes in animal shelters as well – dogs who will cause heartache and trauma for the average dog owner. Sternberg offers tips to help prospective adopters find the diamonds in the rough world of animal sheltering.

Before you visit a shelter
There are a number of steps you need to take before you even set foot inside the shelter door. Doing some pre-visit homework can greatly increase your odds of finding the perfect pup. Here are Sternberg’s suggestions:

• Visit Petfinder on-line, at www.petfinder.org. This web site lists shelters across the country, and can pinpoint the ones in your area starting with those closest to you. You can also search for specific breeds or breed mixes.

Caution: If all dogs on a particular shelter’s website are described the same way (sweet, friendly, loving) then the shelter probably doesn’t know the personalities of their dogs very well, or chooses not to be forthcoming with the information. This would be a good shelter to avoid.

Petfinder is not a complete list of all shelters, so you also need to check your local phone book for others in your area. You should be willing to travel a good distance, as much as three hours or more, to find the right dog at the right shelter.

• Contact the shelters on your list and ask about their return policy. A good shelter will always accept any dog as a return that they have adopted out at any time in his life, for whatever reason the owner may be unable to keep him. You should not expect a refund if you must return your dog, but shelters that refuse to take a dog back after 30 days (or whatever time limit) are not accepting full responsibility for the lives that pass through their hands.

• Ask the shelters about their adoption procedures. You will want to be able to visit with your prospective new family member outside of the kennel. If that is not allowed by a shelter, cross that one off your list.

• Ask the shelters about their criteria for making dogs available for adoption. Good shelters do temperament testing, and do not make dogs available who have a prior history of biting. Some dogs are not appropriate for our human society. A shelter who places all dogs up for adoption and never euthanizes is doing a disservice to potential adopters. Don’t go to such a shelter.

• Sit in on a dog training class (or several). Find a trainer you like, who is kind to dogs and motivates them with treats, toys, and praise. (A selection of trainers from across the country is available from the APDT Trainer Locator at www.apdt.com.) Ask the instructor for good shelter referrals. If there are students in the class with shelter dogs, ask them which shelter they adopted from and what their experiences were. Avoid shelters where others have had negative experiences.

• Talk to the trainer you like about accompanying you to the shelter to select a dog. You should expect to pay a fee for this service, so you may want to arrange to have her visit with you once you find one or more possible adoption candidates.

• When you do start visiting shelters, look beyond a slick exterior. A good shelter is made up by people who care, and the good dogs in their kennels. There are lots of old, rundown, dark and damp shelters that have great dogs and are staffed by wonderful people, and there are others that are just as wretched as they look. There are also bright, pretty, high-tech modern shelters that treat people and animals well, and still others that are all window-dressing, forgetting to treat their human and canine clients with compassion.

• Avoid rigid preconceptions about what kind (age, breed, sex, size, color, coat length) of dog you want. Be prepared to enter the shelter with an open mind. Size, for example, is not a good indicator of energy level or adaptability to a small house – many large dogs are better suited to apartment life than are the typically high-energy but small Jack Russell Terriers.

The shelter visit
Although it’s best to avoid preconceptions about what model of dog you are looking for, Sternberg advises that it is very important to know what to look for behaviorally. “A high level of sociability will contribute more to a dog’s success in a home than any other trait,” Sternberg says. “Overall, be looking for a dog that really likes people and wants to be with them, who is affectionate, congenial, and bonds easily and strongly. These are the dogs who are most fun, and the least worry to live with.”

Stand firm on this behavior criteria as you progress through Sternberg’s 12-step program for adoption success:

1. As you enter the shelter, get a reading on the attitude of staff and volunteers. Are you greeted warmly and treated well? If you are asked to fill out a questionnaire, are the interviewers genuinely interested in who you are and helping you find the right dog, or are you grilled like a criminal? Any concerns about your answers should be used to help educate, not condemn you. If you feel like you are getting the thumbscrews and third-degree, leave. It would be almost impossible to concentrate on your task in an environment like this.

2. When you enter the kennels, make a quick pass through without stopping to schmooze the dogs. Pen and paper in hand, make note of any dogs that stand out for you. Ideally, you might find four or five who do.

3. On your second pass-through, stop and visit with each of the dogs you noted. Put your hand up to the kennel wire or bars. The dog should readily come up to visit you and sniff your hand. Remember, these dogs are socially deprived, and should be seeking your attention. When a candidate sniffs your hand, tell him he’s a good dog, and move your hand back and forth, slowly, several times, about five inches each way. A social dog will follow your hand. Remember, you want a social dog – a well-socialized, outgoing, and friendly dog is the least liable to be aggressive. If the dog jumps at your faces, barks at you, lunges or, alternatively clings to or retreats to the back of the kennel, cross him off your list and move on to the next dog.

4. When you have identified the dogs on your list who are very social, take them out of their kennels one at a time, to a quiet room if possible. (Not all shelters can provide this luxury. Do the best you can – find a relatively quiet corner somewhere.)

Stand with the dog for five minutes, and totally ignore him. The dog should look at you in a warm way, and try to worm his way into your affections – leaning on you, nudging, licking, trying to cuddle. Jumping up is okay if it is done as attention-seeking, not in an attempt to bowl you off your feet as he bounces away from you.

If an employee is with you and the dog is seeking attention from the employee, that’s okay – it just means the dog has already formed a bond with that person. If in five minutes the dog shows little or no interest in you or in other humans who are with you, put him back. He is not a good candidate.

5. If he is very social, pet him slowly and gently down his back. He should stand still and enjoy this, or lean into you, seeking more contact. If he shakes you off after you’ve touched him (“Yuck, people cooties!”) or moves or lunges away from your touch, he’s telling you he doesn’t like being petted, or being around you. This dog is at risk for being aggressive anytime people touch him in a way that offends him. Put him back.

6. If he passes the petting test, ask a shelter staff member if you can feed him a meal – a small bowl of kibble, or a handful of biscuits that you brought with you. You want to test him for resource guarding – another behavior that puts him at high risk for biting. Put a bowl of food or pile of treats on the floor, enough that it will take him about 45 seconds to finish it. Now (BE CAREFUL!) talk to him, then pet him gently on the back. (Do not try to take the food away!) You want him to wag his tail, wag his tail harder, or even stop and look at you as if to say, “Hi! I’m eating right now, I’ll be back with you shortly.” He may even stop eating and prefer to be with you.

However, if he stiffens, blocks you with his body, glares at you, lowers his head into the dish, growls, or tries to move the food away from you, he is a resource guarder, and not a good adoption choice.

7. If he passes the first food test, up the ante. Ask the shelter staff if you can give him a chew hoof, pig ear, rawhide, or some other very valuable object. Again, you want to see if he is cooperative or competitive with this resource. Slowly move toward him and look for any of the guarding signs described in the previous step. If you see them, stop the test. If not, slowly reach for the object from a distance of at least two feet, then jerk your hand back. Repeat this step three times. You are looking for a dog who is relaxed about your approach. If you see any signs of guarding, don’t adopt. Have the staff person retrieve the valuable object and put the dog away.

8. If the dog is still with you, your next step is to pet him all over. He should actively enjoy being petted, perhaps wag his tail, even lick you. He should not mouth you, even gently. If he does, put him away. Mouthiness, even done gently, is a sign of resistance, and may escalate to a bite if someone, such as a child, ignores the sign and keeps on petting or touching.

9. Now take out a toy (that you brought with you for this purpose, or one that the shelter provides, if they prefer) and see if he will play some sort of game with you: fetch, tug-o-war, or chase. Play the game for three to four minutes – enough to get him excited and aroused. Then abruptly stop the play, and put the toy up, preferably on a shelf where he can see it. Take note of how long it takes him to disengage from playing and return to you to settle and socialize, perhaps sit or lie down next to you. Ideally, he will do this within two minutes. If he is still aroused after five minutes, put him away. This is the kind of energy level that the average dog household is not equipped to deal with. (If, on the other hand, you are looking for the next World Frisbee or Agility Champion, he might be a candidate.)

10. Take the dog for a walk on leash, outside if possible. Don’t worry if he pulls, or is very distracted – these are behaviors that are normal for shelter dogs, and can be retrained. Do watch for aggressive behavior toward other dogs or people while he is on leash. If you see any, put him away and cross him off your list.

11. If this dog is still on your list when your walk is done, have a staff person put him back in his kennel, then watch him as other strangers pass by, especially children, big men, and anyone who moves or dresses oddly. Avoid a dog who barks or lunges at anyone who walks by – this is a sign of inadequate socialization. If your dog will be around children, look for a dog who wants to greet passing children first. A dog who will live with children must worship little humans, not just tolerate them.

12. If you still have one or more candidates in the running, ask the shelter staff if you can put them on temporary hold while you make arrangements to return with your kids and spouse (if you have them) and trainer. You may also want to bring your current dog, if you have one, so your trainer can help with the first introduction. Shelter staff may tell you that they can’t put a dog on hold, because if someone else wants to adopt in the meantime and you don’t return for some reason, he might miss out on his best chance for a home. This is reasonable. However, they should be willing to note that you are interested on the dog’s paperwork, and give you a reasonable amount of time to return, so the dog isn’t selected for euthanasia before you can get back with your crew in tow.

When you do return, your trainer will be able to help you make an educated final decision about which of the dogs on your short list is the best choice for a long relationship with your family.

Also With This Article
Click here to view “Awesome Adoptions – Consider A Shelter Dog”
Click here to view “How to Help A Shelter Dog Find Their Home”

The Nutritional Adequacy of Raw Food Diets

The Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA) recently published an article written by two veterinarians about homemade and commercially made raw meat-based diets. (A similar article, based on the same data, was published in the AKC Gazette.) The article has been regarded by many proponents of homemade diets as a warning shot fired by the commercial-food -producing community and their traditional veterinary medical footsoldiers over the bow of the raw feeding ship.

The authors – who are both faculty members at prominent veterinary schools – stated that many arguments exist to support both sides of the issue – that, on one side, raw food diets are healthful, and on the other, that raw food diets can put dogs at risk of nutritional imbalances, complications from ingesting raw bones, and bacterial contamination. Further, they suggested that “neither side has provided evidence to prove that their argument is correct.” Generously, they proposed that they would “objectively assess whether raw food diets prepared by typical pet owners are nutritionally balanced and safe.” So far, so good. Some objective, scientifically based research studies about raw diets would benefit everyone.

Inadequate design
However, in our opinion, the study the authors designed and set up was woefully inadequate for the purposes they intended – unless the purpose was, as some raw diet proponents suspect, to simply publish an article that was critical of raw diets, without regard for the actual results of the study.

To begin with, the authors performed a single analysis of five different diets, including a single sample of three homemade meals that included raw meats and other foods, and two commercial raw meat-based diets.

The authors suggested that each of the homemade diets was prepared according to a raw-diet expert’s outline – one based on Dr. Ian Billinghurst’s BARF (Bones and Raw Food) diet, one based on Wendy Volhard’s “Natural Diet,” and one based on Kymythy Schultze’s “Ultimate Diet.” The commercial diets included Steve’s Real Food for Dogs (a frozen raw-meat-based food that includes fruits, vegetables, and supplements) and Sojourner’s Farm, a grain-based supplement that is added to fresh raw meat. The authors said they prepared this diet to the manufacturer’s directions.

Poor sampling
Before we talk about the analysis itself, a word about the samples tested by the authors.

While the authors proposed that their study would enable them to draw conclusions about the nutritional adequacy and balance of the raw food diets, they knew what the ingredients were in only the two commercial diets. They asked three people they knew who regularly fed a raw-food diet to their dogs to prepare a sample of the diet; however, the authors admit that “Exact recipes of the diets were not provided to us.” Therefore, even though these three samples were taken to be representative of the feeding theories forwarded by Dr. Ian Billinghurst, Wendy Volhard, and Kymythy Schultze, they could not even know whether the owners were preparing the diets correctly, according to instructions given by the originators of the diets.

In fact, it’s fairly clear that the diets were not precisely representative of the raw-food diet experts. For example, the article mentions that all the diets contained “entire breasts or legs of chickens.” However, none of the three homemade diet programs recommend these cuts – Billinghurst and Schultze both recommend chicken wings, necks and backs, which have less meat and more bone, to get the proper calcium/phosphorus balance. Volhard’s basic diet uses beef plus a calcium supplement. All three diets also include occasional feeding of organ meats, but we do not know whether these were included.

Complicating the analysis even more, the samples of homemade diets may have been even less representative of the total diet because of the way they were collected. The person who provided the authors with a sample of a diet based on Kymythy Schultze’s “Ultimate Diet” told Schultze that, for two weeks, every time he fed his dog, he would throw a little bit of whatever he was feeding into a bag in the freezer.

So, if he fed the dog a banana as a snack, he put a chunk of banana in the bag, and if he fed two pounds of meat, a chunk of meat was added. Food items were not added to the bag in proportion to the amount of the item actually being fed to the dog.

Surely the authors must have been aware that a sample collected in this manner could not fairly represent any diet. But because they did not insist that all participants provide them with an exact recipe for their samples, they have no way of knowing whether the samples are prepared according to the diet originator’s directions.

Too many conclusions from too little data
The first and most obvious problem is that the authors drew conclusions about complex feeding programs from analyzing a single sample – and one that was not guaranteed to resemble the diet it was supposed to represent. Unfortunately, the next set of problems are even more egregious.

The authors submitted the five samples to a testing laboratory for analysis of various nutrients, such as protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals, as well as contaminants like bacteria. They then compared these results against the standard for commercial dog food, the AAFCO Nutrient Profile. The result? According to the article, “All the diets tested had nutrient deficiencies or excesses that could cause serious health problems when used in a long-term feeding program.”

The authors concluded, “There are clearly nutritional and health risks associated with feeding raw food diets.”

This study, with its accompanying tables indicating the various “nutrient deficiencies and excesses” of the raw diets, published as it was in a peer-reviewed, reputable veterinary publication, undoubtedly convinced many readers (most of them veterinarians) that raw food diets are harmful.

Doing the math
Fortunately, the article was also read – closely – by people who refused to accept the tables and text at face value, and actually “did the math” to double-check the authors’ allegations.

Steve Brown, President of Steve’s Real Food for Dogs (the maker of one of the two commercial diets studied by the authors) challenged the figures published in the JAVMA article. Brown has had his diet analyzed by commercial laboratories many times in order to be able to provide a “Guaranteed Analysis” on the label of Steve’s Real Food for Dogs that proved the nutritional completeness of his product; he was convinced that, in at least the case of his food, the authors’ numbers could not be correct.

Brown was subsequently provided with “corrected” data by the authors’ attorneys. Sixty percent of the values were different the second time around. No, there was no new testing done, but all the values were recalculated and the majority – as published in JAVMA – were wrong. In more than a dozen instances, the original values were “off” by a factor of 10 or more – in five instances, the decimal point had been put in the wrong place. For at least seven values, when the initial error was corrected, the food then met those requirements. For the two commercial raw diets, only one value out of 28 stayed the same; the magnitude of the errors ranged from 4 to 91 percent.

In a letter to the editor of JAVMA, one of the authors apologized for their “inadvertent computational errors.” Pressed by Brown and others, JAVMA later published a set of “corrected tables;” Brown has found yet more flaws within these tables.

However, the authors do not seem to be in a frame of mind to let facts get in their way. In the May 15 issue of JAVMA, one of the authors wrote, “Even considering these corrections, nutritional imbalances were present, and the overall reservations about raw food diets expressed in our article remain unchanged.”

Real science
One of the major tenets of a “scientific” study is that it must be replicable. Precise methodology should be followed so that other scientists can duplicate the experiment, to see whether the same results occur. However, no one can replicate this data – the authors don’t even know what was in the food! No recipe, not even a list of ingredients, nothing.

Another philosophically vexing problem with this entire issue is the authors’ discernible prejudice. They acknowledge that the arguments in favor of raw food diets are “plausible,” but then seem to spend the rest of the paper trying very hard to prove how terrible such diets are. This is hardly an example of “scientific” thinking, which should be open-minded, unbiased, and rational.

The fact is, no studies have been done to compare the relative healthfulness of raw versus commercial diets – and, conducted in a scientific fashion by a neutral party, this is going to be what it takes to put this controversy to rest.

The tragedy of this flawed study is that the damage has already been done. There are 65,000 veterinarians in the AVMA, and most of them receive this journal. All but about 3,000 of them practice conventional medicine, recommend commercial dog foods, and prescribe commercial therapeutic diets. This article has given them seeming justification for their skepticism about raw food diets. Even if corrections are published, these readers’ opinions have already been influenced. Although JAVMA has printed a series of small corrections and letters to the editor on the topic, without a highly publicized retraction, correction, and/or apology – given about the same space and prominence as the original article – it is unlikely that many will feel it necessary to reconsider their newly solidified positions.

As far as we’re concerned, one of the oddest parts of this whole tale is the report from one participating owner who said that, in all the time he was dealing with the authors, they never once asked him if his dog was healthy. Wouldn’t that be the first question to ask?

 

-By Jean Hofve, DVM

Dr. Jean Hofve is the Companion Animal Program Coordinator for the Animal Protection Institute, located in Sacramento, California.

Taking Measures to Prevent Separation Anxiety Related Behaviors

[Updated October 5, 2017]

Thank goodness, I have never owned a dog with separation anxiety. This complex behavior challenge can be one of the most difficult to live with, and one of the toughest to resolve. The dog who panics when left alone may manifest a range of behaviors that the average owner finds intolerable, including serious household destruction (I’ve heard about dogs who have clawed holes through the walls of their homes, all the way through the outdoor siding), self-injury from biting or clawing at doors or walls, hysterical vocalization (nonstop whining, crying, barking, howling, and/or screaming), and inappropriate defecation and urination – on floors, carpets, beds, and owners’ possessions.

Separation anxiety (SA) stems from a dog’s natural survival instinct to stay in close proximity to the pack. In the wild, a canine who is left alone is more likely to die, either from starvation, since he has no pack to hunt with, or from attack, since he has no pack mates for mutual protection. Given the vital importance of a dog’s canine companions, it speaks volumes about their adaptability as a species that we can condition them to accept being left alone at all! We’re lucky we don’t have far more SA problems than we do, especially in today’s world, where few households have someone at home regularly during the day to keep the dog company.

old dog looking out window

Recipe for Failure

It’s not enough that dogs are naturally inclined to become anxious when left alone. Many well-intentioned but misguided owners of new dogs inadvertently set the stage for SA by doing all the wrong things when they first bring their new dog home.

For example, lots of families adopt their new dog or puppy at the beginning of the summer, when the kids will be home to spend a lot of time with him. Other new-dog parents may take several days off from work, or at least arrange to bring the dog home on a Friday afternoon so they have the entire weekend to help the new kid settle in. On its face, this is a thoughtful approach to acclimating the dog to his new life. What better way to help him feel comfortable and welcome than to give him a couple of days of your loving company?

It’s true that spending extra time with the newcomer can help smooth the transition for him, but unless you take some important precautions, you could be setting him up for a rude awakening on Monday morning when you go back to work, leaving him alone all day to wonder and worry the pack is ever coming back to rescue him from solitary confinement.

Recipe for Success

The key to SA is to never trigger it in the first place. This is without a doubt one of those behaviors where it is well worth investing in many ounces of prevention, lest you end up spending many beginning with making a wise selection of your new family member.

Dogs adopted from animal shelters seem to have a higher than average incidence of SA. We don’t know whether this is because dogs with SA are more likely to be recycled through shelters by their frustrated owners, or because the stress of shelter life triggers SA in previously unaffected dogs. It’s likely that both explanations play a significant role. This doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t adopt from a shelter. It means that you need to look for signs of potential SA whatever the source of your new dog, and especially if you adopt from a shelter or rescue group.

Dogs who seem anxious in general are more likely candidates for SA, particularly those who are worried and clingy. Velcro dogs who won’t leave your side in the get-acquainted area, even though they have just met you, can be hard to resist. “She loves me already,” you think to yourself. “How can I possibly leave her here to face the risk of euthanasia?”

Indeed, that kind of instant bond can be very endearing in the moment. It is far less so when you get home from a hard day’s work to find your sofa cushions in shreds, and dog feces and urine smeared across the kitchen, or worse, a note from your landlord informing you that elderly Mr. Jones with a heart condition who lives in the apartment next door called 11 times today to complain that someone was screaming at the top of their lungs in your living room. If you do think that’s your furry soulmate glued to your leg in the get-acquainted room, do a simple test. Place an inexpensive pillow or cushion that you have purchased at Goodwill for this very purpose on the chair or floor, and leave the dog alone in the room for 10 minutes. Wait outside, close enough that you can hear any activity. Ideally, the shelter will have a one-way window into the room, so you can watch her but she can’t see you. Now, take note of what she does.

A certain amount of activity is normal. She might explore the room, playfully chew on the pillows or other dog toys, snuffle at the door, and stand up on her hind legs to look out the window. She might even whine or bark a bit to see if anyone responds. As long as she seems relatively calm, and settles down after several minutes, you’re not looking at SA behavior, despite her instant and endearing connection to you. You will still need to take precautions not to trigger SA once you get her home, but again, that’s easier than undoing an existing condition.

If, however, she charges in a panic from one end of the room to the other, digs frantically at the door, flings herself bodily at the window, shreds the pillow into tiny pieces and proclaims her distress vocally and insistently, you are looking at a serious behavior challenge. If you choose to adopt her anyway, be prepared to enter into a long-term, potentially costly relationship with a good, positive behavior counselor and a doggie daycare facility.

Puppies are less likely to come complete with a fully developed set of SA behaviors, but again, some are more likely candidates than others. Puppies will naturally exhibit some concern at being isolated from their littermates, but the pup who happily visits with you or explores his new environment is a safer bet than the one who shows immediate distress and a single-minded determination to return to his siblings. A conscientious breeder who makes an effort to separate littermates for brief, non-traumatic periods between the ages of six to eight weeks can help set the stage for a puppy who is able to tolerate being left alone when he arrives in his new home.

Pat Miller is a freelance author and a professional dog trainer. She is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Association of Pet Dog Trainers.

A Guide to Choosing the Best Dog Trainer for You AND Your Dog

So, you’ve decided that you and your dog need professional help. Don’t worry; all relationships can use a helping hand at one point or another. Maybe the two of you have communication issues that need to be dealt with (like your dog doesn’t listen and you wish he would!). Or maybe your bouncing bundle of fur is growing faster and bigger than expected, and you’re desperate for a constructive outlet for all that energy and enthusiasm. You’re sure that training is the answer to your problems – and you are probably right!

But how can you sort through piles of names given to you by well meaning friends, neighbors, your veterinarian, and the folks at the feed store? (We also recommend looking through the Trainer Search at the Association of Pet Dog Trainers web site, found at www.apdt.com. APDT is dedicated to building better trainers through education, promoting dog-friendly methods and encouraging their use.) Getting names is not the problem; figuring out which trainer will be just right for you and your dog is the first step in meeting your training needs. And the following five tips will help!

1. Look for a trainer who offers what you want

That may seem obvious. You want someone to help you train your dog – right? But different trainers have different skills and offer a variety of services. To really narrow down your specific needs and wants, ask yourself:

• Do I want a group class or individual training? Each has its benefits. For someone with a new puppy, a class offers essential opportunities for socialization. Plus, classes are less expensive than individual training. With individual training, however, you’re more likely to get personalized attention and have your specific needs addressed.

• Am I looking for general training or do I need help with a specific problem? If you are dealing with a behavior problem such as barking, separation anxiety or aggression, you may want to look for a trainer or behaviorist with experience in that area.

• Am I primarily looking for short-term training opportunities to help my dog become a happy member of my family, or do I have specific long-term goals such as obedience or agility competition? Some of us look for training classes because we love dog sports and hanging out with people who are as crazy about their dogs as we are.

Take Nancy Layton, for example. Layton, who lives in Aptos, California, with her mixed-breed, Dodger, and her Bearded Collie,Scout, plans to compete with both of her dogs in obedience and agility. “I was working with one trainer that I really liked, but her classes weren’t consistent enough for me,” says Layton who decided to train with a club that offered the structure she needed to prepare for competition.

2. Investigate different training methods
Trainers use a variety of techniques and methods. Most of the techniques do “work” to change behavior, but not all are gentle, kind, and humane. When choosing a trainer, it is essential to understand which training methods are both humane and effective. Positive reinforcement training, for example, works by rewarding what the dog does right. It is an effective, humane, and fun way to train. Dogs can easily (and happily) learn everything from basic manners to masters’ level agility using positive reinforcement techniques.

Positive reinforcement training is becoming more common all the time, making it easier to find good trainers who use reward-based methods. Two of the most popular positive methods are “lure and reward” and “clicker training.” Both use food as the primary reinforcement and both methods are very effective.

We would suggest that you steer away from “traditional” or military based-training methods that use choke or pinch collars. Training can be accomplished without correction-based techniques; force is not necessary to train dogs. In addition, we’d recommend that you run from any trainer that uses inhumane practices such as hitting, kicking, hanging, shocking, or any other action that can cause a dog pain or distress.

When asking a trainer about her training methods, listen carefully to her answer. As positive reinforcement training has become more popular, some trainers who teach using traditional correction-based methods have begun calling themselves “positive” trainers, too. To discover exactly how a trainer works, ask for a detailed explanation of how she would train a basic behavior such as “Sit.” In addition, ask how she would deal with problems like a dog not listening, a dog misbehaving in class, or a dog who displays aggression.

Best of all, ask to sit in on a typical beginner’s class and watch to see whether or not the trainer’s description of his methods actually matches what he practices.

3. Get a feel for the trainer’s people skills, too
A trainer is part teacher, part therapist, and part communications expert, and the right trainer will help you even more than she will help your dog. But let’s face it, most people who become dog trainers do so because they like or even love dogs, not because they are experts at working with people. So how will you know if a trainer who works well with dogs will really be able to teach you?

Again, your best bet is to go and watch a class and observe the students and their dogs. Do they appear to be relaxed and enjoying the experience? Do you understand the trainer’s explanations? Are suggestions offered to students in a way that you feel good about? Are problems handled so that all involved appear satisfied? Or do the students look puzzled or frustrated?

Most important, however, is that the trainer is able to make it clear to you what is working and what isn’t – and what specifically you can do to fix problems. This takes observation skills, communication skills, and diplomacy. Layton notes that feedback she receives must come in a way that feels supportive, not punitive. A good trainer really needs to be able to “positively reinforce” what the person does right, as well as what the dog does right.

4. Check out the trainer’s level of experience
The length of time a trainer has offered professional services doesn’t determine her ability, but it is a gauge that should contribute to your decision. Someone who has less professional training experience but good skills, for example, may be great for a basic training class. In fact, newer trainers often bring to a class enthusiasm, energy, and creativity that a trainer who has taught for a long time may have lost.

However, a less-experienced trainer may not be the best choice for a class that offers specific activities that require overall behavior knowledge and experience. Take off-leash “play time” as an example. During off-leash socialization (even with puppies), a trainer really needs to be skilled at reading canine body language, predicting interactions, and intervening appropriately when necessary. This takes specialized skills. And a trainer without extensive experience and knowledge might not be the best choice for serious problems such as aggression.

How can you assess a trainer’s experience and knowledge? Ask how long she has worked as a professional trainer and how she learned to train. If your dog has a specific behavior problem, ask if she has dealt with this problem before. Remember that a good trainer will acknowledge what she doesn’t know, as well as what she does know.

Most importantly, trust your instincts. If the trainer “feels” like a good match, she probably is. On the other hand, if you do not have full confidence in a trainer’s ability to help you and your dog, you will be less likely to follow her prescribed plan of action and less likely to have success.

5. Cost and convenience count
While it can be said that you get what you pay for, it is equally true that for most of us a training class needs to be both affordable and convenient. A single class can get you started, but many people need or want advanced training opportunities. And the simple fact is, if you can’t afford the classes, you’re not likely to stick with it!

Changing personality?
After you’ve done your research and found a trainer to help you solve your canine relationship problems, all you have to do is get busy and train, right?

Right – but stay alert to apparent “shifts” in your trainer’s training philosophy or methods. If at any time you and your dog seem to frustrate the trainer, or knock up against the limits of her abilities to solve her student’s problems in a positive fashion, you may want to consider taking a break from training and reconsider your choice.

Less experienced trainers (or those who are, deep down, less committed to positive methods) may not have learned to cope with every type of canine behavior issue or with every dog “personality” positively. While it would be ideal if the trainer was the one who recognized his inability to deal with a given situation and gave you a recommendation for another trainer, it’s fairly rare that this happens. If your trainer begins to use punitive methods, citing your dog’s extraordinary “stubbornness,” “disrespect,” or any other trait as justification for force-based methods, politely excuse yourself from the class, and look for a new trainer. Believe me, there are positive trainers who can deal your dog – no matter how rowdy – without resorting to violence.

If your own commitment to positive methods needs reinforcement, I suggest you read Don’t Shoot the Dog by Karen Pryor and Culture Clash by Jean Donaldson. Both of these internationally renowned trainers, leaders in the modern dog training field, bolster the argument for positive training by describing how dogs think and learn. Dogs can and do learn to perform specific behaviors in order to avoid punishment, of course, but they are pleasure-seekers by nature. It’s far more effective, both of the authors conclude, to inspire the dog to figure out what behaviors will result in pleasurable rewards. This not only produces a dog who is motivated to do “the right thing,” but also preserves an affectionate, trusting relationship with his handler.

With good luck, good training, and lots of hard work, you’ll soon be over the rowdy dog blues and on to a fulfilling and happy relationship with your canine pal.

 

 

Iams vs. Nutro: An Update

It’s unfortunate that The Iams Company was not given the opportunity to provide relevant background information and a scientific point of view prior to the publication of “Iams vs. Nutro: A Dog Food Labeling War,” in the May 2001 issue. Here are the facts.

For more than 50 years, the Iams Company has manufactured premium pet food, and our company mission is to enhance the well-being of dogs and cats by providing world-class quality foods.

The feeding guidelines for Iams Dog Foods are based on: (1) extensive experience making, testing, and selling our premium products; (2) the professional judgement of Iams veterinarians and research nutritionists; (3) the collective judgement of independent experts at universities throughout the U.S.; and (4) direct feedback from Iams Customer Service representatives who respond daily to consumer questions about feeding. If dogs were having problems from underfeeding of Iams products, we would be the first to know.

Veterinarians, pet owners, and statistics from across the country tell us that obesity is a serious nutritional problem for dogs, which can lead to a variety of ailments. Proper feeding management plays a key role in helping dogs maintain a healthy weight, and The Iams Company creates feeding guidelines with the dogs’ well-being in mind. These guidelines are carefully designed to help dog owners feed the right amount of food to achieve the best outcome.

Two years ago, we began updating our feeding guidelines for Eukanuba and Iams Dog Foods – lowering the amount of food we recommend dogs be fed each day. Feedback from pet owners, veterinarians, and breeders over the past two years has reinforced the fact that we made the right decision.

Why would a pet food company recommend consumers to feed less of its food? Iams made that recommendation with the health of its consumers’ pets in mind. The allegation that Iams reduced the recommended feeding quantities to lower the cost of feeding is false. The vast majority of Iams’ advertising involves building consumer awareness and brand recognition. We focus on educating pet owners about the nutritional benefits of feeding Iams and Eukanuba products. The cost or value message has never been the focus of our advertising.

While the misinformation about feeding guidelines is unfortunate, it’s not surprising given that Iams’ recent growth and success in the pet food industry has affected our competitors. Today, Iams’ is investing more in research and development, manufacturing, selling and marketing our premium quality products than ever before.

Ultimately, pets and their owners are the real winners as it relates to our feeding guidelines. We take our business very seriously and we will continue to take appropriate steps to protect our reputation as a world leader in dog and cat nutrition.

We appreciate this opportunity to set the record straight, and we encourage any pet owners who have questions about Iams and Eukanuba products to contact Iams Customer Service at (800) 863-4267.

-Daniel Carey, DVM
Director of Technical Communications Research and Development
The Iams Company, Dayton, OH

 

We read with great interest your article “Iams vs. Nutro.” We feel compelled to point out a few things relevant to the last sentence in your article, which states, “It seems that opportunities for corporate profits will always prevail over the needs of consumers and the health of their animals.” This may apply to Iams, but not to Nutro and other competitors who should not be painted with the same brush. Nutro’s objective was and remains to ensure that consumers are provided with accurate information with which to make informed purchasing decisions. We do not expect you to believe it simply because we say so, but ask you to consider the following:

1. When Nutro discovered and confirmed the misrepresentations being made on the Iams label and in related advertising (and confirmed the unhealthful weight loss suffered by dogs fed off the Iams label), Nutro did not seek a competitive advantage by going to the marketplace with this information. Instead, Nutro went to Iams and appealed to Iams privately to correct its statements to the benefit of consumers and their animals.

2. Kal Kan, another competitor, filed a similar lawsuit concerning Iams’ false and misleading feeding instructions.

3. A consumer class action was also filed in California seeking to vindicate harm to consumers that resulted from Iams’ false statements.

Nutro’s conduct, Kal Kan’s conduct, and the consumer class action in California all have as their central objective ensuring that consumers receive accurate information. That is far different from Iams’ conduct, which clearly evidences support for your concern that “opportunities for corporate profit will always prevail over the needs of consumers and the health of their animals.”

-Jerold I. Sicherman
President, Nutro Products, Inc.
City of Industry, CA

 

Interesting, isn’t it? We’ll keep readers posted on developments in this conflict.

Dog Bathing Products Reviewed

Not very many dog owners look forward to bathing their dogs, and most dogs are even less enthusiastic about the ritual than their owners. However, having the right equipment can make the task less burdensome for human and canine participants alike.

There are a number of accessories on the market that claim to make your bathing chore less onerous. These include tools to help you get your dog wet, tools to get her dry, and tools to hold her in place while you do all the stuff in-between. WDJ decided to see which claims really hold water when the suds meet the fur.

We were looking for products that made some aspect of bathing much easier, while being reasonably priced and made well enough to hold up to extended use.

Also With This Article
Click here to view the WDJ’s review on “Dry Shampoos” and “Waterless Baths”
Click here to view the “Tips and Techniques For Bathing your Dog”

-By Pat Miller

Download the Full June 2001 Issue

0
To continue reading this article or issue you must be a paid subscriber. Sign in
If you are logged in but cannot access this content, a) your subscription may have expired; b) you may have duplicate accounts (emails) in our system. Please check your account status here or contact customer service.

Subscribe to Whole Dog Journal

With your Whole Dog Journal order you’ll get:

  • Immediate access to this article and 20+ years of archives.
  • Recommendations for the best dog food for your dog.
  • Dry food, homemade diets and recipes, dehydrated and raw options, canned food and more.
  • Brands, formulations and ingredients all searchable in an easy-to-use, searchable database.

Plus, you’ll receive training and care guidance to keep your dog healthy and happy. You’ll feed with less stress…train with greater success…and know you are giving your dog the care he deserves.

Subscribe now and save 72%! Its like getting 8 issues free!

Already Subscribed?

Click Here to Sign In | Forgot your password? | Activate Web Access

Selecting a Holistic Veterinarian

In every issue, Whole Dog Journal encourages its readers to “consult a holistic veterinarian.” But how do concerned dog owners find a holistic practitioner, and how do they assess that candidate’s qualifications? The answer to the first question is easy: You find a holistic veterinarian by contacting the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association. The answer to the next question is difficult; my complete answer could fill an entire issue! But with just a few pages to speak my piece, I’ll give you my pared-down opinion on how to evaluate a practitioner’s ability to practice quality holistic medicine.

I think there are several parameters that make up a good holistic practitioner, with the emphasis on holistic because I think holistic medical practice is entirely different from a typical western medicine approach. Following is a list of the qualities that I think are important when it comes to evaluating the quality of any holistic practitioner, veterinary or otherwise. Education Most important is the quality and quantity of a practitioner’s education – that is, actual hours spent in the classroom or in dedicated, directed study. For most methods, educators would consider a study program that offers from 10 to 50 classroom hours as mere exposure to the method. Practitioners who think they can gain competency by taking a weekend course and/or by spending a weekend reading a book are deluding themselves and their clients. In my opinion, entry-level competency in some methods can be achieved only with a minimum of 100-200 contact hours, as long as the classroom time includes several dozen hours of instructor-supervised, hands-on professional activities performed in an actual practice environment. To reach an in-depth understanding of the basics of most of the alternative medicine methods requires a two- to three-year full-time study program. In most states, this two- to three-year study program is the depth of study that a licensed acupuncturist (L. Ac.) must obtain to receive a license to practice; it is also the amount of time required for most master’s degree, graduate-level programs. We grant the doctor’s degree – Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM), Medical Doctor (MD), Oriental Medical Doctor (OMD), Doctor of Osteopathy (DO), Doctor of Chiropractic (DC), Naturopathic Physician (ND), etc. – only after the candidate has completed three to four years of undergraduate study and satisfied the requirements of an intensive full-time study program (usually four to six years) directed toward one particular healing method. Remember that these are doctorates in the medicine they represent; they do not necessarily cover anything other than their own specialty. Experience In theory, the more time a practitioner spends actually practicing his craft, the more proficient he will become. However, this assumes that a practitioner will continue to learn and grow and experience new methods and ways of doing things each and every year that she practices. Personally, I had to work with hundreds of animals using homeopathic remedies, acupuncture treatments, and herbal prescriptions before I had a good feel for how my patients should respond to those treatments. In the meantime, though, I think I helped a lot of animals get better – even if I didn’t feel very competent. Interplay between education and experience I can offer my own experience as a testament to the importance of both “hours of education” and “years of experience.” Years ago, I enrolled in one of the courses that train animal practitioners in chiropractic techniques. As a matter of fact, the course I took is the most extensive of all the courses of its type, 150-200 hours long, and is offered by the American Veterinary Chiropractic Association. I may never develop the palpation and adjusting skills of a good chiropractor (who will complete 1,000 to 2,000-plus hours of hands-on, clinical-practice training), but I began to feel reasonably comfortable with the sense that my fingers were palpating the animal’s true problem only after I’d been working with animals for about two years – that is, after I’d spent about 1,000 hours doing hands-on chiropractic adjustments on hundreds of animals. And it took at least that long before I felt I was able to do the adjustments in the way they were taught. So, in my opinion, as a matter of consumer awareness, you should check to see if your practitioner has received a minimum number of in-depth study hours of the method(s) he uses, and an adequate amount of time spent using the methods in his practice – on animals. Results Much more important than either education or time in the practice are the actual results a practitioner generates with her methods. In ancient tribal systems, the “pay” for the medicine wo/man depended on the results he or she produced. But in a tiny tribal society, everyone in the tribe could see those results firsthand! Today, we have no way to evaluate and record a practitioner’s results, good or bad.

Now, absolutely no one (contrary to what you’ll hear from some practitioners) and absolutely no single form of therapy will be able to cure all the diseases presented to them. Whenever I hear some braggart claim a 100 percent cure rate for anything, I know that he is “burying,” literally or figuratively, all of his failures. I suppose it’s just human nature: when we do have a failure, we tend to do our best to forget it, that is, “bury” it in our own minds. Oftentimes a practitioner will remember a failed case as an instance where the client did not comply with all the instructions demanded. Or the practitioner will complain that this case was “let go” too long before it was brought in for treatment. No practitioner, alternative, western, or otherwise, keeps an unbiased database of ALL the patients he/she has treated, along with an honest appraisal of the results. Consequently, clients have to rely on the practitioners’ accuracy and honesty when they assess their own results. (I’ve found that many practitioners, when asked what their cure rate is for a particular type of disease, will answer, “Oh, I cure about 70 percent of those.” This 70 percent figure has become so prevalent in our medical mythology, whenever I hear it, I know it’s bogus!) Interestingly, some practitioners seem to have a knack for treating one particular form of disease while they have problems with other diseases. For example, most of my colleagues claim great successes when treating various forms of epilepsy; I really struggle to have any luck treating any form of this disease, no matter what method I try. On the other hand, for whatever reason, I’ve had several successes when treating thyroid problems, whereas many of my holistic colleagues struggle with thyroid imbalances and often end up using western medicine’s drugs. Keep in mind that some holistic practitioners are willing to take on much more challenging cases than are others. The more challenging the case, of course, the lower the success rate. Now, onto the stuff that’s even more difficult to quantify! Environment of the practice Every practice has its own internal environment, its feel as you walk in the door. In a western medicine practice, we generally look for efficiency and sterility: white-wall cleanliness, quick answers, and one-step cures. In many ways a holistic practice will be almost the opposite of this, although I’d still expect the place to be clean and as odor-free as an animal environment can be. A holistic practice should have the feel that you and your critter’s comfort are an important part of the healing process. There should be a feel of unrushed competency, and you should be able to sense a calming and healing chi as you enter. Practitioner’s ability to educate True holistic healing comes when you take charge of your own health, the health of your family and extended family, and the health of your family of animals. Certainly you may need to rely on the advice and treatments of a qualified holistic practitioner, but ultimately you will be responsible for your own health and the health of those closest to you. With this in mind, the best holistic practitioner will be an educator; doctor comes from the Latin, docere: “to teach.” Educator-practitioners will help you learn the right ways to enhance health, and they will apply best-learning methods so that it is easy for you to learn. Realize that no matter the health problem you are addressing in a holistic manner, in order to truly cure it, you will need to change something – perhaps your family’s diet, your exercise regime, the amount of stress in the household, and/or something else. Whatever the change required, it will be helpful if your holistic practitioner can facilitate that change – act as a coach, if you will. A good holistic practitioner should offer “continuing education” for all his clients. Continuing education should be in the form of basic written materials, a bibliography of important study materials, feedback on treatments and results, and hands-on, experientially-oriented training sessions. In contrast, if, when you ask a question, your practitioner grunts and goes on about his treatment business, fire the schmuck and find someone who is willing to be a true doctor/teacher. Ability to refer In a holistic practice it is imperative that the practitioner have access to several methods of treatment. I am not saying that every practitioner must use all the various alternative medicines. A quick look at the hours required to become proficient in any one method tells us that a practitioner probably has only the time to learn one or two methods really well. But holistic practitioners should have a basic understanding for how a variety of methodologies work. AND, they should know other practitioners they can (and do) refer to whenever one particular method might have an advantage over another. I see far too many alternative practitioners who are firmly convinced that their method (whatever the method happens to be – acupuncture, for example, or homeopathy or chiropractic) is the ONLY way to approach a problem. I think these one-way practitioners tend to get bogged down with the necessity of proving that their method works, and their patients ultimately suffer from this lack of a broad-based perspective on healing methods. Furthermore (as I said in “Building a Foundation of Health,” March 2001), I firmly believe that the most commonly used alternative medicines (acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and herbs) are merely “nudgers and tweakers” when it comes to long-term, in-depth healing. All healing methods require a base of supportive care that includes attention given to lifestyle, relationship, and nutrition. A true holistic practitioner will have at least a basic knowledge of how these can interact with healing, as well as having the skills to use one or more of the alternative medicines. Continuing education There is absolutely no way a practitioner can keep up with the constant changes that occur in medicine, especially the alternative medicines, without a consistent program of quality continuing education. In addition, all practitioners need a periodic assessment of their knowledge and skills to assure these haven’t deteriorated. Practitioners who engage in an annual course of rigorous continuing education are demonstrating their passion, their positive lifestyle, and their ability to charge enough to sustain a level of competency as a practitioner. Your holistic practitioner should be proud to tell you of his/her continuing education program, and as a consumer, you have every right to know if your practitioner is staying current. Practitioner passion To my way of thinking, passion is born from an inner germination of the seeds of love, intention, satisfaction, and creative force. The entry-level guiding light for all practitioners who work on animals is their passionate love for the animals, their intention to make them well and keep them healthy. People who are led by their passions have an energetic glow – an inner light, often expressed as an expanded and healthy outer aura. While none of these outer and inner signs of passion can be measured by scientific means, they can be easily felt and sensed by anyone open to them. Use your sense of awareness (best accessed with an open heart) to feel how much energy your alternative practitioner has. And remember you are evaluating inner energetics – not personal charisma, bedside manner, nor the practitioner’s apparent love for your dog. Practitioner compassion To me, compassion is such an obvious quality of any person who works with animals, it is hardly worth mentioning. Animals are compassion personified, and animals have an innate ability to bring out our own “Inner Compassionate.” But don’t confuse compassion with bedside manner. Professional compassion is the ability to sympathize with the animal’s condition, the inclination to give aid or support. It has to do with honoring the animal, and treating him and his condition with respect. Practitioner health This is simple: Find a practitioner who maintains her own health – if for no other reason, so she’ll still be around to help you a few years from now! Practicing holistic medicine can be extremely demanding and stressful, and for a practitioner to maintain sustainability she/he will need to recharge on a continuing basis. Rechargers for the professional include: continuing education, alternative medicine meetings, learning new methods and techniques, personal chi exercises (tai chi, chi gong, yoga, aikido, and other martial arts), and living a healthy, holistic lifestyle. A question you should ask of all your holistic practitioners is: “Doc, what are you doing for yourself?” In addition to a periodic recharge, all holistic practitioners need to walk their talk, so to speak. Your practitioner should be involved in healthy relationships, must not smoke or have other detrimental lifestyle habits, should be in relatively good physical condition, and should practice what she preaches regarding good nutrition and supplements. In addition, the person who works on your animals should know (and use) several alternative medicine practitioners who work on humans. Finally, a practitioner who expects to stay around for more than a few years will have developed a fee structure that allows her to live a healthy lifestyle. Again, I could write reams about the importance of charging fees that are adequate to sustain the practitioner, but let this suffice: Professionals charge fees for services rendered and goods delivered. Since holistic veterinarians actually frown on vaccines, steroids, and antibiotics, they typically generate very little (if any) income from these sources. And, although there are exceptions to this rule, most holistic practitioners don’t have much of an inventory to sell – their true inventory is their cache of information they have stored in their heads, and their overhead lies in the cost of their specialized schooling. Holistic medicine will almost certainly appear at first glance to be more expensive than the typical visit to a western medicine practitioner. However, I like to think (although I’m not absolutely certain) that the overall fees will be less, over the lifetime of the animal. This, I am sure of: Pets that are living a holistic lifestyle will be healthier over their lifetime. Eye of the beholder Having said all this, let me add that a practitioner’s quality is really in the eye of the beholder. One client may want only a compassionate holistic practitioner who seems to love her dog as much as she does; another may be primarily concerned that the evils of western medicine not be practiced on his dog; a third may be interested in results only, no matter what kind of medicine that requires; and another patient’s wishes may be for a truly holistic approach that supports inner and natural healing of the entire family’s body/mind/heart/spirit/soul. In other words, your expectations and goals are really the first criterion you use to evaluate a holistic practitioner. The ultimate question, then, is: “Did you get what you wanted from your practitioner?” -By Randy Kidd Author Randy Kidd has a DVM degree from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in Pathology/Clinical Pathology from Kansas State University. He is a past president of the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association, and author of Dr. Kidd’s Guide to Herbal Dog Care and Dr. Kidd’s Guide to Herbal Cat Care, published by Storey Books (800-441-5700 or www.storeybooks.com). Dr. Kidd and his wife live on a farm in Kansas.

Dog Parks Help Socialize and Exercise Dogs in a Safe Environment

Summer is upon us, and with it comes an irresistible urge to enjoy the great outdoors with our best canine friends. It’s good for them, fun for us, and besides, trainers and behavior counselors are forever reminding us that a tired dog is a well-behaved dog.

But where can we go to take our dogs out for a high-energy, off-leash run? Regular walks on leash don’t even come close to addressing the exercise needs of most dogs. The result is an exacerbation of canine behavior problems including aggression due to lack of socialization, to destructive behavior, hyperactivity, and separation anxiety.

The best solution to the “place to run” dilemma is the dog park. More and more, savvy community leaders are building fenced areas where dogs and their owners are encouraged to run, play, and socialize together. The concept has caught on and is spreading.

If you are fortunate enough to live in one of the communities that boasts a dog park you may have already availed yourself of its benefits and discovered the joys that such parks have to offer. If you just haven’t checked out the park yet, or don’t go very often due to problems you’ve had with your dog there in the past, see “A Walk in the (Dog) Park.”

But if your town lacks a dog park, read on! You could be an integral part of a movement that improves the quality of life for all your city’s dogs – and their neighbors!

Many benefits
Twenty years ago dog parks were a rarity, but today there are hundreds of safe, dog-centered places for recreation, and that’s a good thing! Here are just a few of the ways that a well-designed dog park can benefit the people in a given community:

• Time spent in a dog park helps socialize and exercise dogs in a safe environment, resulting in well-adjusted companion dogs with fewer behavior problems. This can thereby reduce the number of “nuisance dog” complaints sparked by bored, restless dogs who bark, as well as reduce the number of dogs surrendered by their owners to local animal shelters (with a corresponding reduction in euthanasia numbers).

• The availability of a safe, pleasant dog park attracts dog owners to that site, reducing the presence of dogs in multiple-use areas, and preventing off-leash dogs from infringing on the rights of other community residents and park users, such as joggers, small children, and those who may be fearful of dogs.

• Dog parks can provide an accessible place for elderly and disabled owners to exercise and enjoy their canine companions.

• Use of dog parks promotes responsible pet ownership by giving people the opportunity to allow their dogs to run off-leash legally.

• Informal meetings between people with shared interests – dogs! – are ideal for educating owners about responsible dog care and training.

Dog park detractors
But it’s a fact of life in America that no good idea goes uncritiqued. While dog park supporters seem to be outnumbering their detractors, many criticisms (some valid, some ridiculous) have been used to try to torpedo dog park projects in some communities. These include:

• Dog parks can mean dogfights, resulting in injury to dogs or people

• A dog park will result in accumulations of dog waste and human litter

• Loose dogs are a threat to wildlife living in the park area

Fortunately, the majority of these concerns (and most others you can think of) can be alleviated if a dog park is carefully planned and executed. The very fact that dog parks have been in operation for years in so many communities can help proponents of new projects.

While the dog park pioneers had to figure out what works and what doesn’t by (costly) trial and error, there is now very good information about the best ways to design, build, and manage facilities. If organizers in your town draw on the best examples of successful parks, they can build a new park that will minimize any negative impact on the community and maximize the safety and enjoyment of all who use it.

Overcoming objections
Today, many successful public dog parks are maintained under the auspices of a “user group” – dog owners who frequent the park regularly, educate new users, and help enforce park rules. These user groups can be a valuable resource for educating both the park visitors as well as civic leaders who may have concerns.

For example, the presence of an active user group significantly reduces the risk of one concern expressed by many: dogfights. User group members will step in and encourage (or demand) leashes on or the removal of aggressive or out-of-control dogs. They also help novice dog owners learn how to read their dogs’ body language and intervene appropriately when a conflict seems imminent. (While it can be difficult to “sell” a balky city council on the added expense, it is very helpful to plan the park with two or three separate enclosures. Conflict between large and small and/or bold and timid dogs can be vastly reduced if at least one area is designated specifically for the little and/or shy guys.)

A user group can also ensure that the “accumulations of waste” issue never piles up. Peer pressure is the best insurance against waste disposal problems. If the culture of the park users is such that they consistently clean up their own dogs’ waste (and the occasional unclaimed pile), it will become obvious that they don’t tolerate irresponsible owners who don’t scoop poop.

In fact, the dog park culture can serve an important educational function and public service by teaching unaware dog owners about the importance of cleaning up after their dogs everywhere, not just at the park. Park users can also be instrumental in educating newcomers about disease and parasite prevention and control.

Members of the user group can also help determine what rules will guide the behavior of park visitors, human and canine. Well-run dog parks have clear rules prominently posted at all park entrances.

Rewarding activism
Don’t panic if all of this sounds like a daunting task; you will be amazed at how many like-minded dog lovers there are in your community who would be more than happy to help get a local park built. You won’t have to sell dog owners on the park’s benefits!

However, when dealing with people who have little experience with dogs, be prepared to explain, over and over, how such a park will benefit the humans who happen to own dogs – as well as their neighbors! City leaders may never enjoy the vision of well-socialized dogs playing and running off-leash the way we do, but they should be able to appreciate how much quieter the evenings are, as the tired, happy dogs of your community snore peacefully through the night!

Also With This Article
Click here to view “How To Raise A Well Socialized Dog”

-By Pat Miller

Pat Miller is a freelance author and a professional dog trainer in Fairplay, Maryland. She is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Association of Pet Dog Trainers.

Is Your Pup Ready for The Dog Park?

You’re lucky. You have a fabulous dog park in your community. But so far, you’ve hesitated to turn your beloved buddy loose with the pack of rowdy canines you’ve seen playing there. Or maybe your dog is so unruly that you’ve worried about your ability to get him back on leash once he’s been emancipated. Here are some tips to help you decide whether you two are ready to lose the leash at the park.

First, visit the park without your dog. Observe the interactions between dogs and humans. Do the dogs seem to be getting along well? Are the humans friendly and helpful? Are they willing to answer your questions? If you pick up a negative vibe, try visiting the park at another time of day, or another day of the week. You may have just met the one bad apple at the park; every park has one – non-dog parks included!

Walk the entire park perimeter. Important park design features include adequate access and parking to avoid neighborhood congestion, double-gated entrances to prevent dogs from escaping, well-maintained fences and grounds, an adequate water supply, and a large enough area to minimize space conflicts between dogs. Is the fence well constructed and maintained to prevent escapes? Is it high enough to keep your dog from flying to freedom?

Look for waste-disposal implements and containers. Parks stay cleaner if there are waste containers in several locations throughout the park. These containers should be lined and covered, and emptied frequently. Pooper-scoopers or bags should be plentiful.

Criss-cross the park grounds. Are there hazards present, such as piles of neglected dog feces, broken glass, and foxtails, or is the area clean and safe?

Read the park rules; they should be prominently posted at the park entrance. Are they reasonable rules that you can comply with? Do they enhance the safety and enjoyment of canine and human users?

Now, evaluate your dog’s social skills with a critical eye. Does he enjoy being with other dogs? Can you maintain his attention and obedience even in the company of other dogs? You want the dog park experience to be a positive one for him – and for you. It won’t do him any good to spend the whole time hiding under a picnic table, cowering in fear of a roving pack of rowdy dogs; in fact, it could even make a fearful dog develop some self-protective aggressive behavior. You want to enjoy the experience, too; no one wants to spend an hour trying to catch a dog who hasn’t learned to reliably come whenever he is called (for help with this skill, see “Total Recall,” December 2000).

Seek out experienced help for remedial socialization or training. If your dog is timid, visit the park at several different times of day, and try to find a time when usage is at its lowest. Seek out one or two other gentle or timid dogs and see if you can arrange play dates at low-use times when you can have an underused corner of the park all to yourselves. Repeated good experiences with other non-threatening dogs may be just what your dog needs to get brave about dog park play.

However, if your dog is aggressive, bite the bullet and admit that the dog park is not for the two of you, at least not until you have done successful behavior modification with an experienced positive trainer.

Never leave your dog unattended. Remember, a dog park is not a doggie day care center where you can go and forget about your responsibilities as a dog owner. You must keep a constant eye on your furry pal, to be sure he is neither bullying a smaller dog nor being bullied by a tougher one. Stay alert for signs of tension, and learn how to gently and positively interrupt potential conflict by cheerfully separating the dogs or removing the object of contention.

Keep a sense of humor. Parents who have spent hours at public parks with their children are well aware that not all kids who are there to play are well-behaved, or even nice! Sooner or later, you’ll meet a dog you don’t like. Smile, call your dog, and go explore another corner of the park.

Also With This Article
Click here to view “The Pros and Cons of Dog Parks”
Click here to view “Dog Parks Help Socialize and Exercise Dogs in a Safe Way”

-By Pat Miller

Comparing the Best Raw Dog Food Diet Plans

Have you ever noticed that dog owners tend to select one expert to follow in the area of nutrition and another for training? And they’ll often adhere to their personal guru’s program no matter what? Is it our unconscious dog-like loyalty, or what?

Many of our readers are already preparing their dogs’ food themselves, and generally, they are following the guidelines of some canine nutrition expert. We hear three names a lot – Dr. Ian Billinghurst, Kymythy Schultze, and Wendy Volhard are mentioned most frequently – and they are often being compared to the others.

However, many more of our readers have not yet sorted out the differences between the raw diets being promoted today. To help the readers who fit this description understand the differences between the leading raw food gurus, we present (via the links below) our own objective comparisons of the competing diet plans.

Interestingly, each of the three experts we spoke to had different foods on their lists of desirable ingredients and inappropriate ingredients – despite the fact that each characterizes their nutritional plans as recreations of a dog’s “evolutionary diet.” In other words, their ideals and goals are the same, but the routes they take to there are quite divergent.

Also very dissimilar are the personal styles with which our three experts approach the task of feeding dogs for optimal health. This should come as no surprise; each of these knowledgable people have strong personalities – necessary, perhaps, for buck-ing the commercial dog food establishment! Interestingly, their personalities are reflected in their diets, and their diets, in turn, tend to attract dog owners with similar personalities.

For these reasons, we couldn’t begin to rank these diet plans; it wouldn’t make any sense for us to tell you which one we think is “best” for your dog. In our opinion, based on our research and observations, each of the experts we interviewed has a viable and valuable plan for improving the health of your dog. But you are the person who has to plan ahead, purchase, prepare, and serve the foods to your dog; you have to approach the task with confidence, and take responsibility for the results. Choose the approach that makes the most sense and feels best to you.

Even more to choose from
Please note that there are dozens more raw feeding proponents who promote different “natural” diets for dogs, several of whom have also published books and articles and who frequently lecture on the subject. For this article, we decided to focus on the three people whose names we hear most frequently from our readers. We will examine some of the other leading experts in the field of raw diets for dogs in future issues.

For more information about the raw feeding experts discussed in the above article, refer to their books – each of which is available through DogWise (800-776-2665 or www.dogwise.com) – or the expert’s personal web pages:

Dr. Ian Billinghurst: www.drianbillinghurst.com.

Kymythy Schultze: http://home.earthlink.net/~affenbar/.

Wendy Volhard: www.volhard.com.

-By Nancy Kern

Another Round of Dog Toy Testing – A Focus on Safety, Durability and Cost

0

Testing new toys! This is always our favorite assignment, since we get to spend lots of time playing with our dogs. We have once again perused the pages of various dog supply stores, catalogs, web sites, and trade shows to find a selection of new toys to review. This time, we found a greater than usual percentage of delightful surprises, though we were, as usual, also disappointed a few times.

All in all, remember that proper toy selection is a very individualized venture – you must keep your own dog’s interests, propensities, and chew power in mind when shopping for her.

The reviews here are based on the following criteria:

Dog appeal and human appeal
Obviously, a toy should be attractive in texture and overall appearance; just as obviously, appeal can vary widely from dog to dog and person to person. One dog’s absolute favorite toy might be the next dog’s “Booooring!” But the whole purpose of a toy is to entertain a dog – and, to a slightly lesser extent, the people who enjoy him. Ask any trainer and she will tell you: A bored dog is often a destructive, “misbehaving” dog. Playing with toys can keep a lonely dog busy, give an undermotivated dog incentive to interact with you, and give you endless opportunities to enjoy each other. So, the toy has to look and feel . . . fun!

Safety
Toys should pose no casual danger to the dog. Any toy can be chewed up by some dogs, even the incredibly durable black Kong toy. The toy assortment that is suitable for aggressive chewers is much more limited than the variety of toys for dogs who don’t tend to chew up their toys. But no toy should begin to come apart after just a minute or two of play, exposing dangerously small or toxic components, such as stuffing or threads that can cause internal problems if swallowed.

Even though we deplore the lack of garden variety common sense that necessitates warning labels on dog toys, we like to see safety warnings included with every toy. Most people need to be reminded to supervise their dogs with every toy, and to buy appropriately sized toys for their dogs (no dog should have a ball that he could accidently swallow, for example). If a toy poses special risks – say, a toy that includes rope that contains long threads – then the label ought to include warnings specific to that toy. (For instance. “Do not allow your dog to chew up or swallow the rope or rope fibers as these can cause damage to the gastrointestinal tract.”)

Durability
While the perfect chew object for Tiffany may be shredded in an instant by Jaws, you want the toy to provide at least a few weeks or months of entertainment. At least, we do! We really don’t fancy spending an appreciable percentage of our monthly budget on toys that last only hours or days.

Cost
The above statement notwithstanding, we’re willing to pay more for something that provides tons o’ fun and lasts forever. If it doesn’t meet these criteria, it had better be cheap!

Top new toys
We had better discuss the PitBall while we are talking about spending small fortunes. Yes, this is a fabulously expensive toy; at $129, it’s not a casual purchase for most dog owners. But the PitBall is a be-all, end-all toy for ball-obsessed dogs; it’s not your average dog toy. Think of it as playground equipment rather than a toy, and the price sounds better. For the right dog – one who loves to chase balls and constantly has excess energy (read Border Collie or Jack Russell Terrier), the PitBall can be a godsend.

Created by Gary Bessette, owner and operator of the Puppy PlayGround in Ormond, Florida (see “Members Only clubs For Dogs,” below.), this toy consists of a molded plastic ring, five feet in diameter, and a hard plastic ball, too large and too hard for a dog to pick up in his mouth. The ring is shipped in three pieces, which snap together easily and can be staked to the ground. The concept is simple – the dog chases the ball around and around and around the ring until he gets bored, tired, or until the owner puts the ball away.

Several of our test dogs had no interest in the PitBall – chasing a plastic ball around in an endless circle just wasn’t their thing, and they couldn’t be bothered. Our Scottish Terrier tester showed moderate interest and played with the ball for a few minutes. We left it out for him to play with, and about once a day he will take a turn in the pit, romping with the ball for about five minutes before he gets bored with it. (He did manage to push the ball over the top of the ring once, and thought it was much more exciting to chase the ball around the entire fenced back yard – until it got stuck in a low corner.)

Our Jack Russell tester was another story. He quickly became addicted to the toy; he couldn’t get enough of it. He harassed the red ball mercilessly until we put it away, fearing that the little guy would overexert himself. Every time we brought the ball back out, he ran to the “pit,” ready for play. PitBall proved to be a perfect outlet for his over-the-top JRT energy. There was only one problem: he, too, became adept at flipping the ball out of the ring, and he was just as happy to chase it around the yard. We’ll need a much heavier ball to keep him in the pit.

If your dog loves to chase balls and leans toward obsessive behaviors and hyperactivity, this might be your ticket to a happy, tired pet and a calmer household. Just don’t let him overdo it – be sure to restrict his PitBall activity to a healthy level – physically and mentally.

Stuck on a stick
Boy, were we skeptical about paying $15 for a stick to throw for our dogs, especially since we figured that our moderately hard chewers would turn it into toothpicks in no time. We were delightfully surprised; we have been using the stick for more than two months now, and whatever “non-threatened hardwood” it is made of is pretty darn tough – our dogs’ teeth have barely made a mark on it. We love the Fetch!

Fetch is a 12-inch piece of hardwood, rounded on the ends and tapered in the middle, and, according to the amusing booklet that comes with it, is individually hand-tooled, rubbed to super smoothness, and safe, durable, and non-toxic. It’s almost more a work of art than a dog toy! The maker of the Fetch says it should last forever. We believe it. Our dogs certainly hope so. Of course, we don’t leave it out for them to chew on when we’re not playing fetch, but still, we expected more damage than this.

Our only caveat is that it’s heavy and solid enough that you need to be careful with your aim; you wouldn’t want to bonk your dog on the head, and you wouldn’t want him to try to catch it in his mouth – it might break a tooth!

Getting a handle on it
We wouldn’t want the job of inventing a new type of ball, but the maker of the Action Ball has certainly gotten creative with the task. The Action Ball is essentially a regular ball – it comes in a football, soccer ball, or basketball model – with tough nylon straps harnessed around the ball with two rope tugs extending at opposite ends (look at the photo, above center; it’s hard to describe!).

Our dogs thoroughly enjoyed playing with the ball: chasing it (it’s too big to bite) and carrying it around by the ropes. They play with it by themselves, with each other, and with us. Our 75-pound Cattle Dog mix, Tucker, will grab one rope and drag 20-pound Dubhy around, firmly attached to the other. After more than two months of hard play, our soccer ball is slightly deflated, but still round and very usable (the ball can be easily reinflated with a bike pump and special needle for this purpose). The nylon straps are still intact, and the rope tugs, while somewhat shredded, are still serviceably tuggable.

The Action Ball is one of our dogs’ all-time favorite toys (and ours!). It meets our criteria for a safe tug-of-war toy – long enough that dog teeth stay far away from human flesh, and the ball neatly prevents the dog’s grip from creeping higher and higher up the rope – a hazard with some tug toys.

Improving the tennis ball idea
We were happily surprised by the durability of this simple toy – a hard, hollow, rubber ball, about four inches in diameter and covered with a tough patterned plush.

We’ve never been able to confirm rumors that ordinary tennis balls contain harmful adhesives (or something), but we’re happy to see the manufacturers claim on the ZooBeez balls that the products do not contain toxins of any kind. Dogs who are more determined than ours to dismantle a ZooBeez ball might succeed in doing so, but our ball has held up quite well in the jaws of some pretty tough testers, with no visible signs of damage after two months of dog exposure. While this toy lacks some of the novelty and excitement of our top choices, it is an attractive, sturdy, usable, and affordable item worth adding to your dog’s toy box.

(Not so) tough
These soft toys are so cute, and since they are advertised as “tennis ball tough” we had high hopes that we had finally found a sturdy, soft chew toy. Our hopes were quickly dashed. It took our test dogs fewer than three hours to pop the seams of our adorable Tennis Tough horse (it comes in several animal shapes) and pull out the stuffing.

True, the outer cover itself is tough, and our dogs tossed around the empty horse shell for several days after we removed the stuffing and squeaker, before we finally threw it out. At that point the seams had deteriorated even further, so we were finding pieces of blue horse all over the house.

This is a great soft toy for gentle chewers; two of our dogs would have treasured this toy for years if not for their destructive siblings. If the maker could just find a way to make the seams tougher, it might hold up for stronger chewers, too.

Not comfortable
This 16-inch-long product pictured in the catalog looked like it had great potential to be a safe and sturdy tug toy, with interesting shapes for the dog to grip.

Sturdy it is, indeed. We purchased the “Chew Bar and Inner Tube” model, and found that the plastic bar and tube are so hard that our dogs didn’t even like to hold onto them, preferring instead to grab for the soft nylon rope that holds the pieces together. This put our canines’ canines uncomfortably near my hand, which was holding onto the uncomfortable green plastic handle.

(Note: Contrary to some trainers’ philosophies, we like playing tug-o-war with our dogs. For safety rules and training advice, see “Play and Train by Tugging,” March 1999.)

The same product designed with a little more give in the plastic parts might be a winner, but for now, we’ll pass on this one.

No date for Bettie
The Bettie is an attractive three-legged throw toy, eight inches across, made of a non-toxic rubbery material. The packaging promises that the “buoyant material makes water play fun,” that the “chewy hollow legs” can hold tasty treats, that the “lightweight construction makes throwing a breeze,” and the shape makes it “perfect for tug-o-war.”

Well, it does float.

A small note on the back of the pakaging says, “not recommended as a chew toy.” We concur. It took our Scottie tester a total of three minutes to destroy the Bettie. Even a few retrieves with a dog who mouths the retrieve object at all would do terminal damage to the Bettie, and tug-o-war is out of the question. If you have a soft-mouthed retriever who doesn’t bite down at all, the Bettie might do it for you. Otherwise,your dog is far better off with a Fetch stick.

-By Pat Miller

Latest Blog

Is it Really Separation Anxiety?

I have never owned a dog with separation anxiety, thank goodness. The condition is hard on the dog who suffers from the condition and hard on the dog’s caretakers, too, including owners, vets, groomers, pet sitters, and dog walkers. Care must be taken to prevent triggering the dog’s panic at being left alone—in severe cases, even just long enough for the person caring for the dog to use the restroom!